Episode 284

Ukrainian Drone Attack and the Future of War

Jacob welcomes Sim Tack, a military analyst at Force Analysis, to break down the shifting battlefield dynamics in Ukraine. Together, they unpack Ukraine’s evolving tactics, Russia’s slow but grinding advances, and the logistical and manpower challenges both sides face. Jacob pushes for a bigger picture: what this phase of the war tells us about the future of U.S. involvement, Europe’s strategic posture, and why the world should be watching Eastern Ukraine more closely. Sim offers clarity without sensationalism, grounding the conversation in facts, maps, and on-the-ground realities. It's a sobering, sharp look at a war still unfolding.

--

Timestamps:

(00:00) - Introduction and Podcast Update

(00:14) - Ukrainian Drone Attack on Russia

(00:52) - Analyzing the Impact of the Attack

(02:48) - Details of the Drone Strike

(07:12) - Implications for Global Military Balance

(13:11) - Comparative Analysis with Other Conflicts

(21:28) - Technological Evolution in Warfare

(26:04) - Mexican Cartels and Military Targets

(26:49) - Drone Warfare Evolution

(29:47) - Counter-Drone Technologies

(37:50) - Impact on Russian Air Power

(43:07) - Ukraine's Strategic Timing

(51:30) - Conclusion and Future Discussions

--

Jacob Shapiro Site: jacobshapiro.com

Jacob Twitter: x.com/JacobShap

--

The Jacob Shapiro Show is produced and edited by Audiographies LLC. More information at audiographies.com

--

Jacob Shapiro is a speaker, consultant, author, and researcher covering global politics and affairs, economics, markets, technology, history, and culture. He speaks to audiences of all sizes around the world, helps global multinationals make strategic decisions about political risks and opportunities, and works directly with investors to grow and protect their assets in today’s volatile global environment. His insights help audiences across industries like finance, agriculture, and energy make sense of the world.

--



This podcast uses the following third-party services for analysis:

Podtrac - https://analytics.podtrac.com/privacy-policy-gdrp
Transcript
Jacob Shapiro:

Hello listeners.

Jacob Shapiro:

Welcome to another episode of the Jacob Shapiro podcast.

Jacob Shapiro:

Sorry for the brief, uh, hiatus.

Jacob Shapiro:

It was not intentional.

Jacob Shapiro:

Just had some guest cancel, some personal life.

Jacob Shapiro:

Things come up, but we're back at it.

Jacob Shapiro:

Um, after the Ukrainian drone attack on Russia, I had to get sim on the

Jacob Shapiro:

podcast as quickly as possible because I have been very, uh, spun up on this.

Jacob Shapiro:

Uh, and sim was a nice sober corrective.

Jacob Shapiro:

He told me some of the ways that I was right to.

Jacob Shapiro:

Feel this way, but also was like, Hey, Jacob, like, read it back a little bit.

Jacob Shapiro:

It's not like, it's not like, uh, fundamentally earth shattering either.

Jacob Shapiro:

So, um, I hope you enjoy this episode as much as I did.

Jacob Shapiro:

I always learn so much when I, when I talk to sim and the folks of his ilk.

Jacob Shapiro:

You can write to me@jacobatjacob.com if you have any questions, comments,

Jacob Shapiro:

concerns, et cetera about the podcast.

Jacob Shapiro:

Otherwise, we've got a full slate of guests coming up for this month.

Jacob Shapiro:

So buckle your seat belts, uh, cheers and see you up.

Jacob Shapiro:

All right, SIM it's been too long since, uh, you were on the podcast, which

Jacob Shapiro:

by the way, I think, um, reflects the general level of fatigue around the

Jacob Shapiro:

Russia, Ukraine war, the ongoing war.

Jacob Shapiro:

Like even I have gotten fatigued by some of the news around it.

Jacob Shapiro:

Um, and so we haven't had you on recently to check in.

Jacob Shapiro:

And then lo and behold, last week, the Ukrainians, uh, pull, pull

Jacob Shapiro:

a real rabbit out of their hat.

Jacob Shapiro:

Um, they.

Jacob Shapiro:

They attack Russia with what?

Jacob Shapiro:

Over a hundred drones.

Jacob Shapiro:

Uh, the reporting I've seen, you know, the drones cost like, you know,

Jacob Shapiro:

a couple hundred dollars per drone.

Jacob Shapiro:

Um, and they destroy somewhere between, I don't know, uh, a fourth and a third

Jacob Shapiro:

of Russia strategic bomber fleet.

Jacob Shapiro:

Like those are some of the statistics that I've seen.

Jacob Shapiro:

Um, and for me, it made me stand up in my, or sit up in my chair, stand

Jacob Shapiro:

up in my chair too, uh, and rethink.

Jacob Shapiro:

You know, the global military balance of power.

Jacob Shapiro:

What does this mean for great conventional powers versus asymmetric?

Jacob Shapiro:

Um.

Jacob Shapiro:

Attacks from smaller powers that are next to them.

Jacob Shapiro:

Uh, it's hard not to think of the Israeli attack on Hezbollah with the pagers.

Jacob Shapiro:

And it's hard not to think of the Houthis just chilling there and Yemen like still

Jacob Shapiro:

bombing whatever they wanna bomb, even though Biden and Trump have both tried to

Jacob Shapiro:

scare them and bomb them into submission.

Jacob Shapiro:

Um, so I wanted to have you on to ask.

Jacob Shapiro:

You, I mean, we can talk about, and I'm sure we'll get into sort of the tactical

Jacob Shapiro:

aspects of the Russia, Ukraine war, because even with this massive Ukrainian

Jacob Shapiro:

success, it doesn't look like things are going particularly well for Ukraine.

Jacob Shapiro:

And Russia's been using drones to its own, uh, to its own, you know,

Jacob Shapiro:

great effect on their side and seizing territory from Ukraine.

Jacob Shapiro:

But tell me, as somebody who follows this, this stuff much more granularly

Jacob Shapiro:

than I do, was it a similar Oh shit moment for you, or was it like.

Jacob Shapiro:

Yeah, this is like, they just, I mean, yeah, it's a, it's a higher value target.

Jacob Shapiro:

Like they upped the ante a little bit, but this is what we've been seeing

Jacob Shapiro:

for years, and this is gonna be, is continued gonna be the future of war.

Jacob Shapiro:

So take that, whatever direction you want and we can dive into what all this means.

Sim Tack:

Yeah.

Sim Tack:

Thank you fir First of all, thank you for, uh, for having me again.

Sim Tack:

Um, so on, on the attack itself, um, I, I think it definitely stands out as.

Sim Tack:

Um, an anomalous operation, right?

Sim Tack:

Both in the way that it was set up and the effects that it achieved.

Sim Tack:

Um, so it's, you know, we've seen a lot of back and forth attacks with

Sim Tack:

drones, but not quite like this, right?

Sim Tack:

Not these type of targets, not this type of simultaneous reach, uh, across Russia.

Sim Tack:

Um, one big thing maybe to start at, uh, to address is you, you were

Sim Tack:

mentioning you've seen a lot of those.

Sim Tack:

Statistics numbers being thrown around.

Sim Tack:

Initially I think the, the Ukrainian SBU was claiming 41 aircraft destroyed.

Sim Tack:

Mm-hmm.

Sim Tack:

Um, you know, people making calculations, that's this percentage of the

Sim Tack:

strategic fleet, et cetera, et cetera.

Sim Tack:

Um, so obviously one of the first things that, that I've been

Sim Tack:

doing, one of the things I've been looking at for the past week is.

Sim Tack:

Um, the satellite imagery coming out of those different bases that were struck

Sim Tack:

right, or allegedly struck, um, because there were five air bases inside Russia

Sim Tack:

that were initially mentioned, four main ones where there were some indications

Sim Tack:

that that strikes actually taken place.

Sim Tack:

Um, so the interesting thing is that at least in satellite imagery.

Sim Tack:

We can only observe damage to aircraft in two of those air bases.

Sim Tack:

The other air bases might have been attacked.

Sim Tack:

I can't rule that out, but there's no indications of that.

Sim Tack:

There's no visible damage to aircraft, there's no burnt down plots of grass or

Sim Tack:

foliage as we see at the other places where the explosives set that off.

Sim Tack:

Um, so you know that that's the first kind of dampener on, on just.

Sim Tack:

The scale of, of this operational, at least the scale of its success.

Sim Tack:

Um, second to that is when we look at those two air fields where there was

Sim Tack:

actually damage observed, the number of aircraft that was destroyed gets

Sim Tack:

nowhere near the, the number of 41 that Ukrainian sources initially alleged.

Sim Tack:

Um, I think all combined we've got, um.

Sim Tack:

11 aircraft that were completely destroyed.

Sim Tack:

Uh, seven, uh, I'm just gonna check the numbers, make sure

Sim Tack:

I'm saying the right thing.

Sim Tack:

But yeah, seven T 95 Bear bombers.

Sim Tack:

Um, and then four TU 22, uh, which are, uh, the, the jets versus the, um, uh,

Sim Tack:

the bear, which are the, the big kind of B 52 ish looking, uh, aircraft.

Sim Tack:

Um.

Sim Tack:

So four to 20 twos, and then there's two additional T 20 twos, one that

Sim Tack:

in satellite imagery we can see it was at least damaged, uh, to one of

Sim Tack:

the wings, not completely destroyed.

Sim Tack:

Um, and then there's another to 22 that was likely critically damaged

Sim Tack:

based on some of the, some of the videos that Ukraine's put out.

Sim Tack:

So there's, there's one aircraft that's not among the others that we could see

Sim Tack:

in satellite imagery where you can see.

Sim Tack:

Some distinct damage behind the cockpit, uh, to diffuse lodge, um, which likely

Sim Tack:

makes it in a critical condition, needing some, some very serious repairs,

Sim Tack:

uh, if, if not a full write off.

Sim Tack:

So, um, you know, all combined, we're, we're talking about, um,

Sim Tack:

uh, about 13 of these, uh, of these bombers, these strategic

Sim Tack:

bombers that are out of action.

Sim Tack:

At least now one big caveat is, you know, there might be damage to some

Sim Tack:

other bombers that wasn't, um, easily observed in, in satellite imagery

Sim Tack:

that wasn't proven in the videos.

Sim Tack:

So there, there might be additional damage, but that number of 13 is

Sim Tack:

already several, um, several degrees lower than the, the 41 and the huge

Sim Tack:

percentages of that bomber fleet.

Sim Tack:

Um, even in, in those.

Sim Tack:

Individual air bases, there were many more aircraft that were not

Sim Tack:

hit than, than that were hit.

Sim Tack:

Right.

Sim Tack:

So, um, that's just an, an important thing.

Sim Tack:

So, um, when people are talking about what this means for the, you know,

Sim Tack:

nuclear balance of power in the world, um, obviously this has some effect,

Sim Tack:

but I don't think that this is a qualitative shift where, where Russia,

Sim Tack:

Russia's nuclear deed is suddenly.

Sim Tack:

Um, suddenly inoperable because of the loss of, of these aircraft.

Sim Tack:

Right.

Sim Tack:

I, I also don't think that, um, you know, something that a lot of people have

Sim Tack:

been talking about online is the, the potential threat to us strategic bombers,

Sim Tack:

uh, from similar type of drone attacks.

Sim Tack:

I, I also don't think that, um, that this attack necessarily shows that.

Sim Tack:

Uh, bombers are extremely weak or that would need to completely rethink

Sim Tack:

how bombers fit into the nuclear triad and, and, and things like that.

Sim Tack:

Um, so I, I think there's, there's a lot of, a lot of big talk, big

Sim Tack:

reactions to a very exciting operation.

Sim Tack:

Um, but I think as things calm down, we, we haven't strayed too far from the norm.

Jacob Shapiro:

Okay.

Jacob Shapiro:

That's, that's a good sober corrective.

Jacob Shapiro:

Um, let's, um, let's dive into a little bit more, 'cause I, I wanna

Jacob Shapiro:

talk about the US bombers and the nuclear deterrent and everything

Jacob Shapiro:

else, and I have questions about that.

Jacob Shapiro:

But let's talk about just the nature of the attack itself.

Jacob Shapiro:

Um, so taking, taking your point that, um, at least what we know based on the

Jacob Shapiro:

satellite imagery and the data that you've been able to gather, maybe not as big an

Jacob Shapiro:

attack as what the Ukrainian said, um, but is it, is the quality of even if it was

Jacob Shapiro:

only two bases, and even if it is only.

Jacob Shapiro:

13, uh, you know, strategic bombers, that's 13 more than they were able

Jacob Shapiro:

to bomb this entire war so far.

Jacob Shapiro:

Is, is this a qualitative shift in the ability of smaller

Jacob Shapiro:

powers to attack larger powers?

Jacob Shapiro:

Does this give Ukraine some kind of long, long range, like strike

Jacob Shapiro:

capability that it didn't have before?

Jacob Shapiro:

Or to your point, is this really just like, hey, like the, the,

Jacob Shapiro:

the fact that they have lowered the numbers, um, suggests that

Jacob Shapiro:

this is just, uh, relatively.

Jacob Shapiro:

Relatively normal.

Jacob Shapiro:

It seems not normal to me 'cause I can't think of Ukraine being able to

Jacob Shapiro:

do, you know, if, if even a quarter of what they've claimed is true.

Jacob Shapiro:

That seems like a big deal to me.

Jacob Shapiro:

Are you saying that well, even that's not that big of a deal?

Jacob Shapiro:

Or are you, are you sort of correcting down from the numbers but saying No,

Jacob Shapiro:

this still represents a transformative moment in the history of war?

Sim Tack:

Uh, I don't believe it's a transformative moment, um,

Sim Tack:

because this threat has existed.

Sim Tack:

Right.

Sim Tack:

We, we have seen.

Sim Tack:

Similar kinds of drone attacks.

Sim Tack:

Um, uh, I think it was 2008, 2009, when, when we had those,

Sim Tack:

uh, alleged assassination drones targeting Maduro in, in Venezuela.

Sim Tack:

We've seen Israel use, um, these kind of quadcopter, explosive

Sim Tack:

laden drones, uh, for attacks.

Sim Tack:

So the idea of using these kind of drones to.

Sim Tack:

To attack military targets is, is definitely not new.

Sim Tack:

Um, what stands out about this operation is how close they managed to get

Sim Tack:

inside Russia, far behind enemy lines.

Sim Tack:

'cause that's where these bombers live, right?

Sim Tack:

They, they sit at airfields that are nowhere near the front line.

Sim Tack:

So your, your other systems with more limited range cannot get there.

Sim Tack:

Um, I mean, these drones themselves have fairly limited range.

Sim Tack:

You physically have to get next to the airport to be

Sim Tack:

able to conduct these strikes.

Sim Tack:

So what sets this operation apart is the, the nature of it as an

Sim Tack:

intelligence operation, right?

Sim Tack:

It's, it's the, the infiltration of Russia, it's the preparation of the

Sim Tack:

equipment, the, you know, a lot of people talking about the, the wooden

Sim Tack:

boxes on the, on the trucks, et cetera.

Sim Tack:

Um, it's, it's that kind of intelligence operation that allowed Ukraine

Sim Tack:

to get close to the air fields.

Sim Tack:

Then strike them simultaneously, which is an important element

Sim Tack:

because that starts to go into repeatability of an attack like this.

Sim Tack:

Why do you strike all these air airports or air bases at the same time?

Sim Tack:

Because you know, you might only get one shot, right?

Sim Tack:

Once you conduct an attack like that.

Sim Tack:

Russia is aware of this kind of operation.

Sim Tack:

They're gonna be on alert looking for Ukrainian infiltrate inside Russia.

Sim Tack:

Trucks showing up near air bases, things like that.

Sim Tack:

So doing the exact same thing over again is probably gonna be

Sim Tack:

more difficult in the future.

Sim Tack:

Um, and, and that I think is also the key reason why I don't see it

Sim Tack:

as a transformative event in the way war is conducted because, um,

Sim Tack:

these kind of one-off creative, clandestine, or intelligence operations,

Sim Tack:

whatever you want to call it.

Sim Tack:

Um, you're always going to have those in war.

Sim Tack:

They're, they're, you know, the product of creative approaches to, to real problems.

Sim Tack:

Um, but if something is not a, a threat or a capability that is

Sim Tack:

sustainable, um, I don't think it really reshapes the battlefield.

Sim Tack:

And, and that's the big thing here where yes, it's, it's great for

Sim Tack:

Ukraine that they were able to take out these aircraft and these aircraft.

Sim Tack:

Apart from being, uh, part of, of Russia's strategic force.

Sim Tack:

Uh, of course we're also very much engaged in launching, uh, precision missiles into

Sim Tack:

Ukraine, into western Ukraine, et cetera.

Sim Tack:

Um, so there's a very direct reason for Ukraine to want to

Sim Tack:

take out these air airplanes.

Sim Tack:

And, um, so their success is definitely not meaningless.

Sim Tack:

But I think in the longer term, this capability or this operation does not.

Sim Tack:

Deny Russia the use of those bombers.

Sim Tack:

For the duration of the conflict.

Jacob Shapiro:

Mm-hmm.

Jacob Shapiro:

Okay.

Jacob Shapiro:

I, I, I wanna get to you Ukrainian.

Jacob Shapiro:

We'll, we'll put a pin in that 'cause we'll come back to Ukrainian

Jacob Shapiro:

intentions and the timing of this and all those other things.

Jacob Shapiro:

Uh, but I want to push a little bit more on the nature of this attack, because you

Jacob Shapiro:

raised, you know, Israel using drones.

Jacob Shapiro:

Um, okay.

Jacob Shapiro:

But Israel is going after, you know, non-state militias, maybe sort of

Jacob Shapiro:

sclerotic, you know, authoritarian, uh, Arab regimes when it, when it has

Jacob Shapiro:

those drones, Maduro like, okay, like some drones going after a single guy.

Jacob Shapiro:

This is, you know, going after a country's conventional air force and.

Jacob Shapiro:

Striking a meaningful blow against a, a country's conventional air force.

Jacob Shapiro:

So in that way it seems like a huge escalation.

Jacob Shapiro:

But you, what you might, I, I can hear you saying to me, okay, but that's

Jacob Shapiro:

just a difference in degree, Jacob.

Jacob Shapiro:

But let me give you a tangible example, um, to sort of test what you're saying.

Jacob Shapiro:

Um, you know, one of the things I've sort of taken for granted, um, for.

Jacob Shapiro:

I don't know.

Jacob Shapiro:

Over a decade now, since you and and I, since you and I were together at

Jacob Shapiro:

Stratford, I've taken for granted that Israel could never really

Jacob Shapiro:

strike Iran's nuclear capability because it was just too far away.

Jacob Shapiro:

Like the planes were, their planes couldn't get there.

Jacob Shapiro:

They would need help refueling, or they would need some, you know, they would

Jacob Shapiro:

need the United States or some other actor to help make a strike realistic.

Jacob Shapiro:

And it wasn't clear that any actor was gonna support them.

Jacob Shapiro:

And if they were, you were gonna see those actions before it happened.

Jacob Shapiro:

So it wasn't gonna be that big of a secret.

Jacob Shapiro:

Um.

Jacob Shapiro:

Could that change?

Jacob Shapiro:

Like can Israel use these drones that you've been talking about?

Jacob Shapiro:

Not to just wipe out parking lots in the Gaza Strip, but to go after Iran's

Jacob Shapiro:

nuclear program because that, like, that's where then that would be a sort

Jacob Shapiro:

of change and the capability of a nation to conduct war, if it is or is this like,

Jacob Shapiro:

well, not unless Jacob, they have the Mossad on the ground having recruited

Jacob Shapiro:

Iranians who are actually controlling the things and doing the things.

Jacob Shapiro:

So you would need the intel operation in order to pull it off

Jacob Shapiro:

and maybe you only get one shot.

Jacob Shapiro:

So, uh, react to that example for me.

Sim Tack:

So they, they have done that, not, not necessarily with

Sim Tack:

these same kind of drone attacks, but um, that has been a massive part

Sim Tack:

of, of Israel's, um, efforts to, to contain, uh, Iran's nuclear ambitions.

Sim Tack:

Um, and I'm thinking specifically of the, the attacks against

Sim Tack:

Iranian nuclear scientists.

Sim Tack:

Um, so there, there's been.

Sim Tack:

I, I can't even think of the, the exact dates, but the, by

Sim Tack:

the time we met at Stratford, it was already ongoing for years.

Sim Tack:

Um.

Sim Tack:

But, uh, I, I don't know if you remember those, uh, those operations,

Sim Tack:

like where, where they use a remote controlled gun in, in the back of an

Sim Tack:

SUV to target a vehicle that was driving by, you know, a, a real, real action

Sim Tack:

movie type intelligence operation.

Sim Tack:

You know, um, so that, that sub happens.

Sim Tack:

And, and Israel is definitely leaning on that, especially

Sim Tack:

at times when they don't have.

Sim Tack:

Um, um, that conventional ability to just go in and wipe everything out.

Sim Tack:

Um, I would say more recently we have seen another major change, which is the

Sim Tack:

complete disappearance of the Syrian Air Defense Network due to mm-hmm.

Sim Tack:

Events that occurred in Syria and that, uh, Israel very swiftly exploited to

Sim Tack:

take out anything remotely, uh, uh, air defense capable in inside Syria,

Sim Tack:

because now this actually does leave.

Sim Tack:

Uh, Israel with a large, um, a, a, an open flight route from Israel towards.

Sim Tack:

Uh, towards Iran that it didn't have before.

Sim Tack:

Um, by which I mean to say like, like, yes, conditions change, right?

Sim Tack:

Things, things change.

Sim Tack:

Um, so as, as operations by Mossad inside Iran occur, maybe, maybe they do get

Sim Tack:

experience from this and they, they are able to launch some kind of drone based,

Sim Tack:

uh, attack against these facilities.

Sim Tack:

But where all of that eventually comes back, and I'm gonna.

Sim Tack:

Link it to another element of our days at Strat four, um, when we used

Sim Tack:

to, um, have the guys in the tactical team talk about, um, the attack cycle.

Sim Tack:

Remember that?

Sim Tack:

Mm-hmm.

Sim Tack:

Like the, the whole course, you know, you start with, with surveillance,

Sim Tack:

your, your preparation, et cetera, before the actual attack.

Sim Tack:

So there's, there's a lot of components that take place.

Sim Tack:

Before, you know, in those cases we're talking about terrorist attacks, but

Sim Tack:

I think the attack cycle looks very similar when we're talking about, um,

Sim Tack:

you know, Israeli operations inside Iran or Ukrainian operations inside Russia.

Sim Tack:

Um, and I think that's where Russia really dropped the ball.

Sim Tack:

Um, in, in these cases.

Sim Tack:

The, the fact that Ukraine was able to.

Sim Tack:

Get these, um, these systems assembled inside.

Sim Tack:

Russia was able to deploy them near air bases, was able to scout those air bases.

Sim Tack:

Um, that's where you would normally have expected them to

Sim Tack:

have gotten caught or discovered.

Sim Tack:

Right.

Sim Tack:

Um, and, and that's why when we're talking about the risk of similar kind of attacks

Sim Tack:

against Western Air bases, um, in, in the US in in other NATO countries, um.

Sim Tack:

I would expect, and I would hope that, um, security procedures are much,

Sim Tack:

much tighter, and that if you start to drive around an airbase that hosts B

Sim Tack:

two bombers multiple times in a, in a short timeframe, you would probably get

Sim Tack:

pulled over and you'd have some really tough questions to, uh, to answer.

Sim Tack:

Um, same thing with a truck suddenly appearing.

Sim Tack:

Um, my assumption would be that there is very active, um, scanning for, for

Sim Tack:

objects appearing that don't belong in the areas of these strategic facilities.

Sim Tack:

Um, I, I think those are all types of things that are less ingrained

Sim Tack:

in the, the kind of Soviet style security services in Russia.

Sim Tack:

So maybe that exposes them.

Sim Tack:

A little more to this kind of attack.

Sim Tack:

But then as that attack happens, of course, that that also means that the next

Sim Tack:

time you try to hit those bombers, you're gonna have to do it slightly differently.

Sim Tack:

So it becomes another new creative intelligence operation that you have

Sim Tack:

to set up and you might succeed.

Sim Tack:

But I think that still makes it like a one-off type of attack rather than, you

Sim Tack:

know, we're able to actually suppress that capability on the Russian side.

Jacob Shapiro:

I think you're a little too sanguine of, at least in

Jacob Shapiro:

the United States, about the, the thoroughness of the security here.

Jacob Shapiro:

I mean, we're talking about a country that just a couple months ago accidentally

Jacob Shapiro:

fired a bunch of the employees that were supposed to be working on nuclear

Jacob Shapiro:

safety and then tried to hire them back.

Jacob Shapiro:

I also, I don't know if you've seen the picture of this 22-year-old, uh,

Jacob Shapiro:

who is now apparently being tasked with, um, heading up the Center

Jacob Shapiro:

for Prevention Programs at DHS.

Jacob Shapiro:

So like one of the primary like US departments for going after terrorism.

Jacob Shapiro:

Was working.

Jacob Shapiro:

I mean, no offense to those working in grocery stores, but he was in a

Jacob Shapiro:

grocery store a year ago in his picture.

Jacob Shapiro:

Like if I was a terrorist, and I'm looking at this picture on, um, the

Jacob Shapiro:

Department of Homeland Securities website, I would be like, cool, like,

Jacob Shapiro:

probably security's not so good here.

Jacob Shapiro:

But, um, in, in any case, uh, I, I think though in your response,

Jacob Shapiro:

like, yes, Israel has assassinated Iranian scientists by car bombs in

Jacob Shapiro:

some of these other ways, but could Israel knock out Iranian air defense?

Jacob Shapiro:

With a coordinated, huge, massive drone strike.

Jacob Shapiro:

Could it take out a nuclear facility with drones?

Jacob Shapiro:

Like that's the, the sort of leap.

Jacob Shapiro:

And I guess another, I'll let you respond to that, but another sort of

Jacob Shapiro:

test example for what you're talking about, and this is one that I think has

Jacob Shapiro:

gotten a lot of currency and I'm, I'm curious to hear what your response is.

Jacob Shapiro:

I mean, I'm, I'm on record as saying I don't think China is

Jacob Shapiro:

gonna invade Taiwan anytime soon.

Jacob Shapiro:

But let's say there's a naval conflict in the South China Sea and

Jacob Shapiro:

China's on one side and the United States is on the other side of it.

Jacob Shapiro:

Um.

Jacob Shapiro:

United States, like key to its naval power is its aircraft carriers.

Jacob Shapiro:

Uh, does using drones in this sort of manner basically just make the carriers

Jacob Shapiro:

sitting ducks, like, I'm not thinking really about, oh, that the Chinese are

Jacob Shapiro:

gonna use drones to attack us, you know, air assets inside of the United States.

Jacob Shapiro:

But if you're in the South China Sea and you've got three carriers deployed.

Jacob Shapiro:

What at this point, makes those key warriors?

Jacob Shapiro:

Anything but sitting ducks for massive drone attacks from the Chinese, like that

Jacob Shapiro:

seems another way in which this completely transformed the balance of power in,

Jacob Shapiro:

in a conflict that we could imagine.

Sim Tack:

I, I mean, I mean, that's a very good use case.

Sim Tack:

And there's, there's actually a very good recent example on the use of

Sim Tack:

drones in, in kind of a conventional setting outside of Ukraine.

Sim Tack:

Um.

Sim Tack:

One of the big things I wanna say is when I'm saying that this attack by

Sim Tack:

Ukraine is not a transformative event.

Sim Tack:

That doesn't mean that the drones by themselves are not

Sim Tack:

transformative in warfare, right?

Sim Tack:

I just don't think that this event is the big unveiling of a new

Sim Tack:

capability that changes things.

Sim Tack:

But you're absolutely right.

Sim Tack:

The existence of these small drones and growing capabilities in coordinating

Sim Tack:

these drones with other types of operations, using swans, et cetera,

Sim Tack:

things that have been theorized and and talked about and practiced for decades.

Sim Tack:

Um, but that are now becoming more practical knowledge as they're

Sim Tack:

being executed on the battlefields.

Sim Tack:

Right.

Sim Tack:

I, I do believe that is a big difference and, and, you know, a big threat

Sim Tack:

to any, any war fighter out there.

Sim Tack:

Um, now the example I wanted to to mention is that in, um, uh, in the, the current

Sim Tack:

kind of simmering troubles between, uh, Pakistan and India, um, there, there

Sim Tack:

was actually an incident recently.

Sim Tack:

Um, that I, I heard from some people, um, where, uh, Pakistan used a number

Sim Tack:

of regular civilian drones, um, without arming or anything, no explosives

Sim Tack:

involved, um, to go and harass, uh, Indian forces as a distraction.

Sim Tack:

So they were, they were literally just flying drones into Indian

Sim Tack:

troops and into their positions, um, to keep them occupied while.

Sim Tack:

Actually executing other, uh, operations at the same time.

Sim Tack:

Um, so even something as simple as that when you're talking about Israel

Sim Tack:

leveraging this to, um, um, suppress or, or destroy Iranian air defenses or China

Sim Tack:

leveraging it to, um, to, let's, let's say distract the defenses of a US carrier

Sim Tack:

group, uh, I think that's very feasible.

Sim Tack:

The, the question is, how, how are you actually going to conduct it?

Sim Tack:

There's a lot of ways that you can approach that.

Sim Tack:

Um, obviously these drones themselves don't have the range to go from mainland

Sim Tack:

China to wherever, uh, a US carrier group might be hanging out at open seas.

Sim Tack:

Um, but, you know, let, let's assume the Chinese are launching these drones

Sim Tack:

from, from somewhere in the water.

Sim Tack:

Maybe they're even carrying them all the way there in unmanned.

Sim Tack:

Uh, unmanned surface vessels.

Sim Tack:

Uh, which, you know, another thing that we've seen really growing in importance

Sim Tack:

in Ukraine, the way, the way that Ukraine has used those kind of vessels to even

Sim Tack:

take down aircraft, uh, from open sea.

Sim Tack:

Um, so people, people are using these, these remote operated platforms or,

Sim Tack:

or even autonomous platforms in really creative ways and, and obviously

Sim Tack:

that is going to change a lot.

Sim Tack:

About the ways that that wars are fought.

Sim Tack:

And I, I don't think there's even a limit to that.

Sim Tack:

Um, but I think that just becomes an, an, uh, an overall part of the, the

Sim Tack:

technological evolution of, of warfare.

Sim Tack:

Right?

Sim Tack:

Um, and it's not necessarily specifically targeted against those strategic assets

Sim Tack:

like, uh, like the nuclear bombers.

Sim Tack:

Um, it's, it's a more.

Sim Tack:

General, um, evolution of, of the level of technology that your, your

Sim Tack:

standard war fighter is employing.

Jacob Shapiro:

Yeah.

Sim Tack:

Does that make sense?

Sim Tack:

It does, it does.

Sim Tack:

A little bit of a

Jacob Shapiro:

rant.

Jacob Shapiro:

No, no, no.

Jacob Shapiro:

You're this, you're, you're literally here to go on rants.

Jacob Shapiro:

That's the whole point.

Jacob Shapiro:

Um, uh, okay.

Jacob Shapiro:

Well, one last example I wanna throw at you, and then I want to get into some

Jacob Shapiro:

of the, well, actually, there's, there's two more conceptual questions I want to

Jacob Shapiro:

ask you, and then we'll get into some of the specifics about Russia, Ukraine.

Jacob Shapiro:

Um, you know, we talked about Israel, Iran, uh, it sounds to

Jacob Shapiro:

me like you answered to China.

Jacob Shapiro:

Taiwan was, yeah.

Jacob Shapiro:

Actually, this does shake up how you would think about a

Jacob Shapiro:

conflict in the South China Sea.

Jacob Shapiro:

Uh, correct me if I'm wrong, you talked about India,

Jacob Shapiro:

Pakistan using its distraction.

Jacob Shapiro:

There's also, and, and this is the one where it starts to get very dystopian,

Jacob Shapiro:

um, where this now empowers non-state actors in a way that pre drones, they

Jacob Shapiro:

wouldn't necessarily have had that power.

Jacob Shapiro:

I'm thinking specifically about Mexico, but you can imagine other examples

Jacob Shapiro:

where you have groups like cartels who exist outside of the government, um, and

Jacob Shapiro:

who have problems with the government.

Jacob Shapiro:

Does this now give them some kind of capability to go after

Jacob Shapiro:

the conventional assets of the.

Jacob Shapiro:

Of the military, of the country that they're in.

Jacob Shapiro:

The cartels have used drones already for assassinations and for attacks in,

Jacob Shapiro:

you know, far flung areas and some of their turf wars and things like that.

Jacob Shapiro:

Even attacks on local police.

Jacob Shapiro:

But you haven't seen a Mexican cartel say, go after like a Mexican military

Jacob Shapiro:

garrison or after a Mexican strategic air asset or something like that.

Jacob Shapiro:

In part 'cause the conflict hasn't gotten there yet.

Jacob Shapiro:

But does this, like if you are a country where you have a non-state actor or you

Jacob Shapiro:

have a rebel group or something like that.

Jacob Shapiro:

Does this, even the balance of power in some meaningful way, like should now,

Jacob Shapiro:

like can a cartel or you know, a militant group in some country in the world,

Jacob Shapiro:

like take this playbook and strike the conventional capacity of the government

Jacob Shapiro:

they're, that they're going against?

Jacob Shapiro:

Or am I reaching too far there?

Sim Tack:

Again, I think all the things that you're saying all are correct

Sim Tack:

except for that one little part.

Sim Tack:

The, this now.

Sim Tack:

Part, right.

Sim Tack:

Where mm-hmm.

Sim Tack:

I, I think all of this has been the case for over a decade.

Sim Tack:

We've, we've seen the use of these kind of drones emerge and, and grow and

Sim Tack:

become more professional over the course of the Syrian Civil War, uh, Islamic

Sim Tack:

state operations in both Syria and Iraq.

Sim Tack:

Um, and from there, it, it has panned out to the rest of the world.

Sim Tack:

Ukraine has been another.

Sim Tack:

Kind of big, um, uplift in, in the level of those capabilities.

Sim Tack:

Um, but we've also seen that kind of, uh, the, the adaptation of those same

Sim Tack:

kind of drones in places like Sudan, um, Mexico, as you mentioned, the cartels

Sim Tack:

using those kind of drones, I, I think that capability is, is well, well known

Sim Tack:

and, and being adopted by anyone that.

Sim Tack:

That is trying to grasp at any means they can to try and gain

Sim Tack:

advantage over their, uh, opponents.

Sim Tack:

And I think it's not even just an asymmetric warfare element where, um,

Sim Tack:

even conventional forces and, and you know, Ukraine being the big example of

Sim Tack:

that, even conventional forces order stronger actors in a conflict even want

Sim Tack:

to adopt these kind of technologies because they're just so damn effective.

Sim Tack:

Um, and in, in.

Sim Tack:

Mexico.

Sim Tack:

I think one of the reasons why we haven't seen them go after air bases or, or to

Sim Tack:

sink the, the Mexican Navy is because those, those assets simply aren't

Sim Tack:

what's troubling the cartels, right?

Sim Tack:

You want to focus your efforts against the things that you're, uh,

Sim Tack:

you're actually being troubled by.

Sim Tack:

Um, now I would say if, if, if we go all the way back to, um.

Sim Tack:

Uh, the Islamic State in, in Syria and Iraq.

Sim Tack:

Um, I remember them using drones to attack Syrian air assets, for example.

Sim Tack:

Um, of course Syria doesn't have nuclear bombers, but, um, still taking down.

Sim Tack:

Uh, attack helicopters, well, not taking down, but destroying attack

Sim Tack:

helicopters on the ground, destroying fighter aircraft on the ground.

Sim Tack:

That was a pretty big win for them.

Sim Tack:

Um, but I would also add to that, that I don't remember any incidents

Sim Tack:

where Islamic State was able to target coalition air bases in the same way.

Sim Tack:

Um, because obviously those, those coalition air bases were.

Sim Tack:

Much farther removed spatially from the battle space, um, had different levels

Sim Tack:

of security than the, the Syrian one.

Sim Tack:

So I, I think that's kind of the, um, the, uh, the struggle, uh, or, or I guess

Sim Tack:

the balancing that is happening, right?

Sim Tack:

Where on the one hand you have this capability, these groans, but it's also

Sim Tack:

limited in, uh, in range and access.

Sim Tack:

Um, and then you can actually set up security procedures against it.

Sim Tack:

There's also a lot of counter drone weaponry these days.

Sim Tack:

Um, some of it focusing on detecting these drones early.

Sim Tack:

Uh, some of it focusing on, um, disrupting the communications,

Sim Tack:

disrupting, uh, control of these drones.

Sim Tack:

Um, and that actually kind of.

Sim Tack:

Points to some of the interesting elements in that whole arms race as well.

Sim Tack:

Where in Ukraine you see evolutions towards the use of, um, uh, fiber

Sim Tack:

optic commanded drones, where, where the drones are actually leaving

Sim Tack:

a, a, a string of fiber optic that connects them to the controller.

Sim Tack:

Because then they can't be jammed or they're not detected by, uh,

Sim Tack:

by electronic warfare equipment.

Sim Tack:

Um, and then as we saw in the attack against the Russian air

Sim Tack:

bases, where allegedly these drones targeted the aircraft

Sim Tack:

purely based on, I. On AI training.

Sim Tack:

So they, they were, at least that's the story going around, that they were

Sim Tack:

trained on images of these bombers and kind of self targeted bombers that matched

Sim Tack:

the ones they were trained to target.

Sim Tack:

Um, which is, which is feasible for sure.

Sim Tack:

Um, but that dependence on AI is also way to cut off external

Sim Tack:

communications and, and dependencies.

Sim Tack:

It, it means that if, if everything, if your navigation you're targeting

Sim Tack:

is computed within the drone.

Sim Tack:

You don't have to rely on a radio signal in and out of the drone,

Sim Tack:

uh, to conduct your operation.

Sim Tack:

So again, that, that cuts off that potential line of defense in, in terms

Sim Tack:

of electronic detection or, or jamming.

Sim Tack:

Um, so I, I think it's a really fascinating, uh, a really fascinating

Sim Tack:

arms race because it's, it's a really.

Sim Tack:

It's, it's kind of niche technology going up against each other.

Sim Tack:

And that's why when we're talking about these potential future, uh,

Sim Tack:

scenarios where a US carrier group might face these kind of drone based

Sim Tack:

challenges, um, we also have to think about how, how is the US Navy

Sim Tack:

preparing for those kind of threats?

Sim Tack:

I, I would imagine they're very actively, uh, investing time and resources into.

Sim Tack:

Detecting those kind of drones, jamming, those kind of drones, kinetically,

Sim Tack:

taking out those kind of drones.

Sim Tack:

Um, so it, it's difficult to say just because they exist, they are a threat.

Sim Tack:

Right.

Sim Tack:

The, the counter threat

Jacob Shapiro:

might also, I.

Jacob Shapiro:

Already have been developed.

Jacob Shapiro:

Yeah.

Jacob Shapiro:

You sort of anticipated my next question, which is how do you

Jacob Shapiro:

defend against these things?

Jacob Shapiro:

Like is there already gonna be technology that makes this advantage

Jacob Shapiro:

mood, and is that the sort of technology that only, you know, someone with

Jacob Shapiro:

an advanced conventional capability is going to to have, I mean, the.

Jacob Shapiro:

The flip side of this though is, I mean, this is where it does feel

Jacob Shapiro:

asymmetric and here the example of Israel, you know, we're always gonna

Jacob Shapiro:

come back, I think, to examples of Israel, Yemen, Ukraine, Russia.

Jacob Shapiro:

'cause this is where war is happening.

Jacob Shapiro:

Um, but, you know, uh, iron Dome and Israel's missile defense system, you

Jacob Shapiro:

know, developed in, in cooperation with the United States, incredible,

Jacob Shapiro:

like an incredible success rates, but also like extremely expensive.

Jacob Shapiro:

Like the Iranians showed this, where they can, you know, pop off relatively

Jacob Shapiro:

cheap Rockets exhaust the supply of the.

Jacob Shapiro:

The missile defense system and then, okay, like eventually you're

Jacob Shapiro:

gonna run out of money and you're gonna run out of the counters.

Jacob Shapiro:

Um, so I dunno, maybe somebody will invent some type of technology.

Jacob Shapiro:

Maybe you can like send out an EMP pulse or something in one direction.

Jacob Shapiro:

Like now we're getting really science fiction oriented.

Jacob Shapiro:

But like, is is there a way to defend against these things like it, or are

Jacob Shapiro:

we gonna see a whole industry of how to defend against drones in general?

Jacob Shapiro:

Um, yeah.

Jacob Shapiro:

Take that however you want.

Jacob Shapiro:

Great.

Jacob Shapiro:

That, that industry already

Sim Tack:

exists and it's, it's definitely.

Sim Tack:

Pumping out revenue.

Sim Tack:

Um, but it's

Jacob Shapiro:

a pumping out product though.

Sim Tack:

Well, yes.

Sim Tack:

Yeah.

Sim Tack:

I, I, I think it is.

Sim Tack:

But there's also a lot of solutions that are not necessarily entirely

Sim Tack:

focused on this new threat.

Sim Tack:

So you, you have these companies, uh, pushing these anti drone guns, right?

Sim Tack:

Like the ray, the futuristic looking ray guns that you aim at the drone,

Sim Tack:

and, and it gives a very concentrated deem to jam the signal effectively.

Sim Tack:

Um.

Sim Tack:

But let's, let's not forget that, you know, the, the whole

Sim Tack:

electronic spectrum of warfare is, is not exactly something new.

Sim Tack:

That's, that's something that's been going on since the sixties, seventies when, uh,

Sim Tack:

um, when the use of various kinds of, uh, radars and jamming and, and restaurant,

Sim Tack:

all of those things has, has only grown.

Sim Tack:

Um, so.

Sim Tack:

You know, kind of as an example of that, one of the things that Ukraine has also

Sim Tack:

been doing to, um, to save on kinetic interceptions, um, 'cause as you mentioned

Sim Tack:

with Iron Dome, that's one of the reasons that the system is so damn expensive.

Sim Tack:

'cause those interceptors are one use by definition or single use.

Sim Tack:

Um, so.

Sim Tack:

One of the things that Ukraine has been doing is using the F sixteens,

Sim Tack:

um, that it got from, from European partners, um, to jam the Iranian shaha

Sim Tack:

drones that Russia fires at them.

Sim Tack:

So instead of kinetically targeting, they, they will target some of them

Sim Tack:

kinetically, obviously they, they, there's a lot of them to take down, but

Sim Tack:

they also use the electronic warfare equipment on the F 16 to jam it so

Sim Tack:

that the drone, you know, either.

Sim Tack:

Loses its navigation goes down or turns back or, or whatever they do based

Sim Tack:

on, on how exactly they're affected.

Sim Tack:

Um, so that's, that's another way that you can kind of limit the resources.

Sim Tack:

'cause, you know, electronic warfare is, is relatively cheap in

Sim Tack:

the sense that it doesn't require.

Sim Tack:

Ammunition, right?

Sim Tack:

It, it requires powering.

Sim Tack:

Of course, you need to acquire these systems and the systems themselves

Sim Tack:

surely aren't cheap, but, um, but there's no big logistical train

Sim Tack:

for the production of, of advanced missiles and, and things like that.

Sim Tack:

So, um, so I think that's why, why we're seeing a lot of focus on

Sim Tack:

that, um, on that electronic jamming component of, of fighting drone threats.

Sim Tack:

Um.

Sim Tack:

But of course there's, there's a lot of ways that, that the drones themselves are

Sim Tack:

being hardened against electronic warfare.

Sim Tack:

And, you know, I, I mentioned the, the fiber optics, which of

Sim Tack:

course is still limited in range.

Sim Tack:

You can only carry so heavy, a spool of, of fiber optics.

Sim Tack:

Um, and, and that'll only have a limited, uh, length that you can achieve.

Sim Tack:

Um.

Sim Tack:

The AI systems might, you know, not have that range restriction.

Sim Tack:

But then at the end of the day, you know, how, how complex of an

Sim Tack:

operation can you conduct purely on.

Sim Tack:

Like pre-program, pre-trained behavior, uh, without risking, you know,

Sim Tack:

either mission failure or collateral damage and, and things like that.

Sim Tack:

So there's, there's these, these pretty big trade-offs.

Sim Tack:

Um, I think one of the other things that we don't see a lot about today,

Sim Tack:

I'm, I'm sure it is being experimented with and a lot of these war zones, but.

Sim Tack:

Um, and another way to combat that kind of jamming is, is directional communications,

Sim Tack:

um, using lasers or, or antennas that are very specific about where they, they're

Sim Tack:

able to receive signal from so that it's, you know, any signal that comes in

Sim Tack:

from other directions is shielded out.

Sim Tack:

Um, so there's, there's a lot of things going on there, and I'm, I'm not sure.

Sim Tack:

Whether we can make a guess about like, you know, which, which side will win out.

Sim Tack:

Will it be, you know, the drone threat cannot be tamed or the

Sim Tack:

defenses will be so effective that it becomes completely irrelevant?

Sim Tack:

Um, I, I think right now we're in that phase where everybody is so actively

Sim Tack:

exploring it and, and pushing it as far as they can, that the two are, are

Sim Tack:

kind of constantly in balance, right.

Jacob Shapiro:

Yeah, absolutely.

Jacob Shapiro:

Um, and to all these things, there's a balance.

Jacob Shapiro:

Um, alright, well let's, let's talk a little bit more specifically

Jacob Shapiro:

about, um, Russia, Ukraine.

Jacob Shapiro:

Um, I, um, I take your point about, um, you know, is this gonna lead to

Jacob Shapiro:

the attack of US strategic bombers?

Jacob Shapiro:

Probably not.

Jacob Shapiro:

Is this gonna de deter Russia's nuclear deterrent or, uh, limit Russia's nuclear?

Jacob Shapiro:

Uh, excuse me.

Jacob Shapiro:

Is this going to limit Russia's ability to have a nuclear deterrent

Jacob Shapiro:

or to have nuclear strike capability?

Jacob Shapiro:

No, I thought that was pretty sensational.

Jacob Shapiro:

Uh, I think specific question, and the one I don't have clarity on is,

Jacob Shapiro:

does this meaningfully impact the operations of the Russian Air Force?

Jacob Shapiro:

Does this mean that the Russian Air Force is going to be less capable of attacking

Jacob Shapiro:

or bombing Ukraine in the future?

Jacob Shapiro:

Are the security checks and protocols that Russia's gonna have to put in to protect

Jacob Shapiro:

from Ukraine, is that going to create.

Jacob Shapiro:

You know, supply chain havoc, or is that gonna limit the capacity of Russian

Jacob Shapiro:

air power to respond to future attacks?

Jacob Shapiro:

Uh, can Ukraine spoof a bunch of attacks in the future?

Jacob Shapiro:

Just send shit across the border and like see if they can spin

Jacob Shapiro:

things up and make them constantly guessing about what's going on.

Jacob Shapiro:

So, um, I, I, I take your points on the bigger ones, but is there a, is

Jacob Shapiro:

there a tangible impact on Russian air power in, in any way, whether that's

Jacob Shapiro:

capacity to do bombing runs or how they think about future operations?

Sim Tack:

So, yeah, there's definitely an impact and I, I don't think the impacts

Sim Tack:

necessarily in, in terms of the collective capacity that Russia can muster, but it's,

Sim Tack:

um, it's imposing a lot of additional, uh, tail to, to these operations.

Sim Tack:

Um, by, by tail I mean like the, the, the force protection element of, of.

Sim Tack:

Uh, of their air operation.

Sim Tack:

So one part of that, as you mentioned, you know, they'll, they'll have

Sim Tack:

to contribute more resources to, um, to securing those airfields.

Sim Tack:

Even though they're far away from Ukraine, Russia cannot

Sim Tack:

afford to leave them unprotected.

Sim Tack:

Um, and that's, um, you know, that's, that's another.

Sim Tack:

Field of activity where they cannot just draw people away and push them

Sim Tack:

to the front in Ukraine, that it means you're actually gonna have to have

Sim Tack:

people there to protect the air bases.

Sim Tack:

Um, in addition to that, um, something that's already been happening, uh,

Sim Tack:

because of other attacks against Russian air assets, um, not, not so much the,

Sim Tack:

the big heavy bombers, but against, uh, airfields closer to the front line, um, is

Sim Tack:

that Russia has been forced to disperse.

Sim Tack:

It's air assets, right?

Sim Tack:

So, um, the less aircraft you keep at one single base, the more you spread

Sim Tack:

them out, the more difficult you make it for Ukraine to, uh, to destroy a

Sim Tack:

lot of aircraft in a single attack.

Sim Tack:

Um, so, and, and actually Russia has already been doing that with

Sim Tack:

their strategic bomber fleet.

Sim Tack:

For quite some time during the Ukraine conflict.

Sim Tack:

'cause there have been other attempts in the past to target them, um, like

Sim Tack:

at Angles Airbase, where they've launched the, the long range drones

Sim Tack:

to, uh, to target, uh, the air base.

Sim Tack:

Um, so they're constantly trying to play a game of cups where they're, they're

Sim Tack:

moving, they're moving their bombers around, they're moving their fighter

Sim Tack:

aircraft around to try and, um, you know, make, make it as difficult as

Sim Tack:

possible for Ukraine to, to target them.

Sim Tack:

But at the same time, that is, that is raising a cost on Russia's behalf, right?

Sim Tack:

Because on the one hand, your, your flight crews are constantly adapting to new

Sim Tack:

locations that they're operating from.

Sim Tack:

Um, the logistics, uh, uh, support for all of those operations

Sim Tack:

has to constantly be rerouted.

Sim Tack:

Uh, you know, so after the attacks, uh, against the Russian

Sim Tack:

airfields, uh, one of the first things that we saw appearing were.

Sim Tack:

Aircraft to transport equipment and personnel out of these bases to other

Sim Tack:

bases where they will now be basing some of these, uh, these bombers.

Sim Tack:

Uh, but all of those constant air bridges inside Russia, those are

Sim Tack:

also taking a toll, uh, a toll on, on Russia's capabilities.

Sim Tack:

'cause the, um, you know, there's the cost of the operations themselves and, and fuel

Sim Tack:

man hours, however you want to express it.

Sim Tack:

Um.

Sim Tack:

But the, the increased level of operations, the increased tempo of these

Sim Tack:

kind of flights also means that there is a higher, uh, potential for accidents.

Sim Tack:

Um, uh, Russia tends to not have the best reputation when it comes to, uh, aviation

Sim Tack:

safety and any kind of additional stress, additional flights that are required.

Sim Tack:

That, that only increases the, the potential of, of Russian aircraft going

Sim Tack:

down without Ukrainian intervention.

Sim Tack:

Um, so, you know, those are just a, a couple like, you know, examples that I,

Sim Tack:

that I'm pulling out, but in general, like yes, these kind of attacks, they, they

Sim Tack:

are putting a constant force protection, uh, stress on the Russian military.

Sim Tack:

And RAHA can decide to deal with that in two ways.

Sim Tack:

They can either.

Sim Tack:

Either commit to that and, and that means there's less resources that they could

Sim Tack:

otherwise have pushed to the frontline, or they can decide to ignore it and

Sim Tack:

prioritize that frontline, but then.

Sim Tack:

You know, essentially expose some of their more strategic assets

Sim Tack:

to, to those kind of threats.

Jacob Shapiro:

Mm-hmm.

Jacob Shapiro:

Which gets to the question of, and this is like always the question when

Jacob Shapiro:

it comes to the thing, uh, when it comes to these things, why did Ukraine

Jacob Shapiro:

you think, decide to do this Now?

Jacob Shapiro:

They've been planning this for 18 months, they said, um, the situation does not

Jacob Shapiro:

correct me if I'm wrong, does not appear to be going so well on the battlefield.

Jacob Shapiro:

Um, they're getting pre, you know, they're.

Jacob Shapiro:

Yes, they have Europe more in their corner, but, you know, the United States

Jacob Shapiro:

is not what it was even, you know, six, eight months ago in terms of support.

Jacob Shapiro:

Like Trump is very, very different than Biden.

Jacob Shapiro:

So the diplomatic picture looks a lot more complicated.

Jacob Shapiro:

Um, like I, I take your point that they're gonna put pressure on, on Russia,

Jacob Shapiro:

but they're also are putting pressure on Russia to respond in a way that is

Jacob Shapiro:

extremely meaningful, which might open up a whole Pandora's box there too.

Jacob Shapiro:

So, should we see this as a sign of Ukrainian strength?

Jacob Shapiro:

Do you think that they saw some sort of political moment where now is a time that

Jacob Shapiro:

if they did this, they could push towards negotiations from a favorable position?

Jacob Shapiro:

Should we read it as Ukrainian weakness, as a sign of desperation that they're

Jacob Shapiro:

losing things on the front lines and they felt the need to push back or.

Jacob Shapiro:

Punch back in any sort of way to either prove to themselves or to their allies

Jacob Shapiro:

that they could continue forward.

Jacob Shapiro:

How, how do you evaluate the timing or the answer also could just be because

Jacob Shapiro:

they could, like they wanted to do it.

Jacob Shapiro:

So like if you're fighting war, like you pull the levers, it's

Jacob Shapiro:

not so strategic all the time.

Jacob Shapiro:

But what do you think about the timing of this?

Sim Tack:

I think it's very difficult to make, to draw conclusions from the timing.

Sim Tack:

Um.

Sim Tack:

There, there are so many different factors that could be at play here.

Sim Tack:

One, one of them is simply, you know, that preparation for that operation.

Sim Tack:

Were they, were they just ready And they launched it as soon as they could

Sim Tack:

before potentially being discovered?

Sim Tack:

Um, was there a risk of discovery and did they prematurely launch

Sim Tack:

it before everything, uh, went completely out the window?

Sim Tack:

Um.

Sim Tack:

Or you know, as, as you mentioned, was there some kind of political

Sim Tack:

initiative where it's like, Hey, this operation's been.

Sim Tack:

On the books, it's ready to go.

Sim Tack:

Now's a good time.

Sim Tack:

I, I have no idea.

Sim Tack:

And I, I, I don't think I could in, in, in any kind of useful way speculate about it.

Sim Tack:

Um,

Jacob Shapiro:

but I think then, then, then spec, then speculate

Jacob Shapiro:

about it in a non-useful way.

Jacob Shapiro:

That's, that's also good too for me.

Sim Tack:

Well, let, let try to pull it in, in, in a, in a, maybe

Sim Tack:

in another useful direction, which is in, instead of trying to think

Sim Tack:

about the, the intent of the timing.

Sim Tack:

We, we can talk about the impact of the timing, right?

Sim Tack:

Where, um, like as, as you mentioned, the conflict in Ukraine itself has kind of

Sim Tack:

stagnated a lot of people losing interest.

Sim Tack:

Um, Ukraine has that u European support, but I think one of the big things

Sim Tack:

about that U European support is that we've seen it also kind of evolve

Sim Tack:

to, to want to align with Trump's.

Sim Tack:

Uh, ambitions when it comes to Ukraine.

Sim Tack:

So, mm-hmm.

Sim Tack:

I feel like a lot of the conversations between Europe and Ukraine have started

Sim Tack:

to be about, uh, security guarantees once that hypothetical ceasefire is in action.

Sim Tack:

Um, there are of course still discussions going on about supporting Ukraine

Sim Tack:

and, and, and actions going on to support Ukraine during the actual

Sim Tack:

fighting short of such a ceasefire.

Sim Tack:

Um.

Sim Tack:

There's no real big qualitative shifts in that.

Sim Tack:

Um, I mean, there is the discussion with Germany about unleashing the,

Sim Tack:

the Taurus missiles, uh, which would give Ukraine another, um, you know,

Sim Tack:

long range precision weapon that, that they can launch into Russia.

Sim Tack:

Um.

Sim Tack:

But I also don't think that that's really going to turn the tide of

Sim Tack:

the war or anything like that.

Sim Tack:

The reality is that the war has evolved to a point where the lines

Sim Tack:

on the ground are very static.

Sim Tack:

Russia continues to push a lot of resources into the frontline,

Sim Tack:

and they continue to make gains, um, but in a positive sense.

Sim Tack:

And I, I think we've talked about that in, in previous, um,

Sim Tack:

in previous podcasts where, uh.

Sim Tack:

Russia kept advancing, but Ukraine was kind of, um, not doing its due

Sim Tack:

diligence in, in setting up additional defensive lines behind their current

Sim Tack:

positions, which caused them to, you know, quickly have to give up

Sim Tack:

terrain and then not necessarily do any better after withdrawing.

Sim Tack:

So that's something that we've seen change.

Sim Tack:

So since the beginning of this year.

Sim Tack:

Um, around February, March, we've seen some really impressive defensive

Sim Tack:

preparations behind the front lines on the Ukrainian side, um, which I think also

Sim Tack:

signals Ukraine's current position, right?

Sim Tack:

Dealing with Trump, with Europe.

Sim Tack:

Everybody's talking about the cease spire.

Sim Tack:

Um.

Sim Tack:

I think they're also being realistic and understanding like, hey, we're,

Sim Tack:

we're not gonna get into a position where we get the level of support that

Sim Tack:

allows us to quickly break through and take all this territory back.

Sim Tack:

Um, but if they can stabilize the frontline, if they can achieve some

Sim Tack:

kind of ceasefire, and if Europe and us come through with all the security

Sim Tack:

guarantees that they've been talking about, I think that's a, that's a

Sim Tack:

scenario that Ukraine is more and more.

Sim Tack:

Um, uh, looking more and more positively at, um, and then they're

Sim Tack:

putting the preparations in place by, by creating those defenses.

Sim Tack:

Um, meanwhile on, on the Russian end of things, even though, you know, Russia

Sim Tack:

continues to gain gain ground slowly but surely, um, they are still paying.

Sim Tack:

Heavy prices.

Sim Tack:

Um, they, you know, we've seen the impact on, on the Russian economy over time,

Sim Tack:

which has not really gotten better.

Sim Tack:

Um, we've seen, you know, Russia trying to replace some of the arms production

Sim Tack:

with supplies from North Korea.

Sim Tack:

Which hasn't really helped.

Sim Tack:

We've seen them bringing in North Korean troops.

Sim Tack:

I, I think that happened after we last spoke, or, or maybe around

Sim Tack:

the time we last spoke, I forgot.

Sim Tack:

But, um, you know, those came and went and that hasn't really made a big difference.

Sim Tack:

Um, so Russia is trying to really muster all it can to keep the war going.

Sim Tack:

They're not in a position right now where they want to accept

Sim Tack:

a ceasefire in these positions.

Sim Tack:

Um.

Sim Tack:

Because obviously they, they still want to try and, and use the current

Sim Tack:

advances they're making to, to bully Ukraine and or the West into, um,

Sim Tack:

achieving a higher political goal.

Sim Tack:

You know, I. Kind of like what they started the war for, but

Sim Tack:

never realistically could achieve.

Sim Tack:

Mm-hmm.

Sim Tack:

Um, so anyway, in, in that entire situation that, that's

Sim Tack:

kind of a long-winded sketch of, of the current situation.

Sim Tack:

But if, if you're looking at that situation and then you see this

Sim Tack:

attack occurring, um, against the, the Russian strategic barber fleet, um,

Sim Tack:

that's one of those elements where.

Sim Tack:

Ukraine can still have an impact beyond simply digging in on the

Sim Tack:

frontline, and that at the very least has a big visual impact on Russia.

Sim Tack:

Um, so it's another one of those stressor I. Events that, that put

Sim Tack:

stress internally in Russia on the government because the, the appearance

Sim Tack:

of, you know, the government is messing up the approach to this conflict.

Sim Tack:

We're gonna waste our, our nuclear deterrent over this

Sim Tack:

little patch of land in Ukraine.

Sim Tack:

Um, all of those ideas, um, start to put stress on, on

Sim Tack:

the, on the Russian government.

Sim Tack:

Um, of course this, this is a limited amount of stress compared to.

Sim Tack:

The whole full spectrum of, of stress that they're under.

Sim Tack:

Um, but I think that's, that's where I would kind of place this operation.

Sim Tack:

It's, it's one of those, one of those things where Ukraine can still

Sim Tack:

reach out and try to have a visible impact on Russian regime stability.

Sim Tack:

Um, and, and I think they'll continue to try and do those kind of things.

Sim Tack:

It, it probably won't be the same type of operation, probably

Sim Tack:

not the same type of target.

Sim Tack:

Um.

Sim Tack:

But that's, that's probably one of the, one of the big tools that they have.

Sim Tack:

Uh, without capabilities to actually reshape the, the

Sim Tack:

battlefield on the ground.

Jacob Shapiro:

I'm not sure whether all this makes me feel better or worse, sim,

Jacob Shapiro:

but I definitely feel like I know more.

Jacob Shapiro:

And that is the point of all of this at the very end.

Jacob Shapiro:

So I could talk to you for another hour, but unfortunately,

Jacob Shapiro:

um, I have to wrap it here.

Jacob Shapiro:

Um, but I. We will not wait another six months to have you back on.

Jacob Shapiro:

We'll have you on extremely soon, I think, because, I mean, I didn't even get to ask

Jacob Shapiro:

you how the heck the Houthis like made problems for the F 30 fives because I've

Jacob Shapiro:

read the Wall Street Journal reporting and all of it just doesn't make sense to me.

Jacob Shapiro:

But let's not open that can of worms right now.

Jacob Shapiro:

We'll leave the listeners wanting more.

Jacob Shapiro:

Thanks for making the time.

Jacob Shapiro:

And it looks like, uh, I mean, listeners, you can't see this, but

Jacob Shapiro:

there's a very nice collection of liquor behind, uh, behind your left.

Jacob Shapiro:

Looks like you're primed for a good weekend.

Sim Tack:

Uh, yeah.

Sim Tack:

Well, I'm, I'm, I'm hoping it lasts slaughtered on the weekend though.

Sim Tack:

Oh, yeah.

Jacob Shapiro:

Yeah.

Sim Tack:

You only love once.

Jacob Shapiro:

Thank you so much for listening to the Jacob Shapiro podcast.

Jacob Shapiro:

Uh, the show is produced and edited by Jacob Mian, and it's

Jacob Shapiro:

in, in many ways, the Jacob Show.

Jacob Shapiro:

Um, if you enjoyed today's episode, please don't forget to subscribe.

Jacob Shapiro:

Rate or leave a review, it takes just a couple seconds of your time, but it

Jacob Shapiro:

really helps us also share with a friend.

Jacob Shapiro:

If you're interested in learning more about hiring me to speak at your

Jacob Shapiro:

event, or if you wanna learn more about the wealth management services

Jacob Shapiro:

that uh, I offer through bespoke or at cognitive investments, you can find

Jacob Shapiro:

more information@jacobshapiro.com.

Jacob Shapiro:

You can also write to me directly at jacob@jacobshapiro.com.

Jacob Shapiro:

I'm also on, on X for now with the handle.

Jacob Shapiro:

Jacob Shap.

Jacob Shapiro:

That's Jacob.

Jacob Shapiro:

SHAP.

Jacob Shapiro:

No DATs dashes or anything else, but I'm not hard to find.

Jacob Shapiro:

Um, see you out there.

About the Podcast

Show artwork for The Jacob Shapiro Podcast
The Jacob Shapiro Podcast
Geopolitical and Financial Insights